|
This well
made brace is laid out exactly like the early malleable-iron frame
Spofford braces made by John S. Fray, but the split-frame chuck is
adjusted by a sleeve engaging a threaded member embedded in the frame instead of by the usual thumbscrew.
This brace's maker's mark:
|
John S. Fray & Co. mark:
|
![Manufacturer's mark](http://www.georgesbasement.com/braces/SpoffordsPat-Coattails/MfgrsMark-852.JPG)
|
!["Spofford's Pat." on a Fray-manufactured brace](http://www.georgesbasement.com/galootsales/Sale03042015/MemStckPix02/March23-1880-794.jpg)
|
Nelson Spofford's March 23, 1880 patent covers the method of coring the split in the making of the original casting and would indeed apply to the present brace. In the bottom image on the left, this brace (on the top) is compared with a regular Spofford brace made by John S. Fray & Co.
(below). The two wrist handles are nearly exactly the same size &
shape, but with differing widths of their cast-in-place pewter rings (see another Fray brace here) but the present brace's casting shape is better integrated with the shape of the handle than are the Fray-made brace's frames.
This brace's key concept is the combination of the paired
inclined planes in the floating threaded block that engage ramps inside
the rectangular-outline holes in the jaws, along with the conical
surfaces on the outer ends of the jaws that are engaged by the conical
interior of the threaded shell, that together squeeze the jaws flexibly
against the tapered square tang of the bit.
There is no corresponding patent by Nelson Spofford for the closing of a split-frame chuck with a sleeve like the present brace,
and there is no such patent in Pearson's compendium of brace patents, but
there are a number of patents involving the split-frame concept:
Spofford's #225,768 patent is the one that applies to the
method of coring the frame split, and Knowles #210,335 patent comes
close with two years earlier prior art with which the present brace
might have interfered.
|