Microstructures
by George Langford, Sc.D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1966
Copyright©
2005 by George Langford
Non Ferrous Alloys - Lesson 1 - Third specimen
Underpoled copper 50X etched
This is underpoled copper, shown at 50X.  The liquid metal was stirred with a freshly cut sapling.  No kidding; I saw this done in about 1958 in a visit to a copper company.  The "sapling" was actually a tree trunk about forty feet long and six inches in diameter, hung by the middle from a winch and manipulated by three strong men.  Hydrogen freed by heat from hydrocarbons in the pole combines with dissolved oxygen in the molten copper to form steam bubbles, deoxidizing the copper.  Too little poling leads to porosity due to steam evolution during freezing.  This photomicrograph shows a tremendous amount of eutectic compared to the properly treated copper in Specimen 2 (previous).
Explanation of poling of copper
This frame explains why the steam bubbles form in the solidifying copper.
Eutectic microstructure of underpoled copper, 200X etched
At 200X at left you can see the classical eutectic microstructure of the metal.  Compare to the divorced (phase-separated) eutectic in Specimen 2.




Hi mom Poling is necessary to deoxidize the copper.  Too little poling gives too much eutectic oxide and too much porosity as well as bulging of the ingot.  Too much poling permits too deep a shrinkage pipe to form, leaving a severe depression in the center of the ingot which leads to the formation of seams and cold shuts during subsequent hot rolling.



In Specimen 4 we go on to a three-component system.